The ability of MUP parameters to discriminate between normal and neurogenic MUPs in concentric EMG: analysis of the MUP “thickness” and the proposal of “size index”
- 1 October 1993
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section
- Vol. 89 (5), 291-303
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-5597(93)90068-z
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Invited review: Electrodiagnostic assessment and monitoring of motor unit changes in diseaseMuscle & Nerve, 1991
- Principal component analysis of the features of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentialsMuscle & Nerve, 1989
- Simulation of myopathic motor unit action potentialsMuscle & Nerve, 1989
- Evaluation of an automatic method of measuring features of motor unit action potentialsMuscle & Nerve, 1989
- Simulation of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentialsMuscle & Nerve, 1988
- Quantitative Analysis of Individual Motor Unit Potentials: A Proposition for Standardized Terminology and Criteria for MeasurementJournal Of Clinical Neurophysiology, 1986
- Electrophysiological cross section of the motor unit.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1980
- Diagnostic yield of the analysis of the pattern of electrical activity of muscle and of individual motor unit potentials in neurogenic involvement.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1977
- Diagnostic yield of analysis of the pattern of electrical activity and of individual motor unit potentials in myopathy.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1976
- Action Potential Parameters in Normal Human Muscle and their Dependence on Physical Variables.Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 1954