Comparison of Early Invasive and Conservative Strategies in Patients with Unstable Coronary Syndromes Treated with the Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitor Tirofiban
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 21 June 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 344 (25), 1879-1887
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200106213442501
Abstract
There is continued debate as to whether a routine, early invasive strategy is superior to a conservative strategy for the management of unstable angina and myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation. We enrolled 2220 patients with unstable angina and myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation who had electrocardiographic evidence of changes in the ST segment or T wave, elevated levels of cardiac markers, a history of coronary artery disease, or all three findings. All patients were treated with aspirin, heparin, and the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. They were randomly assigned to an early invasive strategy, which included routine catheterization within 4 to 48 hours and revascularization as appropriate, or to a more conservative (selectively invasive) strategy, in which catheterization was performed only if the patient had objective evidence of recurrent ischemia or an abnormal stress test. The primary end point was a composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and rehospitalization for an acute coronary syndrome at six months. At six months, the rate of the primary end point was 15.9 percent with use of the early invasive strategy and 19.4 percent with use of the conservative strategy (odds ratio, 0.78; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.62 to 0.97; P=0.025). The rate of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction at six months was similarly reduced (7.3 percent vs. 9.5 percent; odds ratio, 0.74; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.54 to 1.00; P<0.05). In patients with unstable angina and myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation who were treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban, the use of an early invasive strategy significantly reduced the incidence of major cardiac events. These data support a policy involving broader use of the early inhibition of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in combination with an early invasive strategy in such patients.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non–st-segment elevation myocardial infarctionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000
- Assessment of the Treatment Effect of Enoxaparin for Unstable Angina/Non–Q-Wave Myocardial InfarctionCirculation, 1999
- Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronary-artery disease: FRISC II prospective randomised multicentre studyThe Lancet, 1999
- A prospective randomized trial of triage angiography in acute coronary syndromes ineligible for thrombolytic therapyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1998
- Outcomes in Patients with Acute Non–Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction Randomly Assigned to an Invasive as Compared with a Conservative Management StrategyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Adding heparin to aspirin reduces the incidence of myocardial infarction and death in patients with unstable angina. A meta-analysisJAMA, 1996
- One-year results of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) IIIB clinical trialJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1995
- Effects of tissue plasminogen activator and a comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Results of the TIMI IIIB Trial. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Ischemia.Circulation, 1994
- Risk of myocardial infarction and death during treatment with low dose aspirin and intravenous heparin in men with unstable coronary artery diseaseThe Lancet, 1990
- Aspirin, Heparin, or Both to Treat Acute Unstable AnginaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988