Are Patient-specific Cutting Blocks Cost-effective for Total Knee Arthroplasty?
- 1 March 2012
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Vol. 470 (3), 889-894
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2221-3
Abstract
Using patient-specific cutting blocks for TKA increases the cost to the hospital for these procedures, but it has been proposed they may reduce operative times and improve implant alignment, which could reduce the need for revision surgery. We compared TKAs performed with patient-specific cutting blocks with those performed with traditional instrumentation to determine whether there was improved operating room time management and component coronal alignment to support use of this technology. We retrospectively reviewed 57 patients undergoing primary TKAs using patient-specific custom cutting blocks for osteoarthritis and compared them with 57 matched patients undergoing TKAs with traditional instrumentation during the same period (January 2009 to September 2010). At baseline, the groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, and BMI. We collected data on operative time (total in-room time and tourniquet time) and measured component alignment on plain radiographs. On average, TKAs performed with patient-specific instrumentation had similar tourniquet times (61.0 versus 56.2 minutes) but patients were in the operating room 12.1 minutes less (137.2 versus 125.1 minutes) than those in the standard instrumentation group. We observed no difference in the femorotibial angle in the coronal plane between the two groups. Patient-specific instrumentation for TKA shows slight improvement in operating room time management but none in component alignment postoperatively. Therefore, routine use of this new technology may not be cost-effective in its current form. Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do Patient-specific Guides Improve Coronal Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty?Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2012
- Critical review of the current practice for computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement surgery: cost-effectiveness and clinical outcomeCurrent Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2011
- Editorial: What is Varus or Valgus Knee Alignment?Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2010
- Imageless computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement. A Bayesian meta-analysis of 23 comparative studiesInternational Orthopaedics, 2010
- Initial experience with custom-fit total knee replacement: intra-operative events and long-leg coronal alignmentInternational Orthopaedics, 2008
- Accuracy of MRI vs CT imaging with particular reference to patient specific templates for total knee replacement surgeryInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2008
- Custom-designed orthopedic implants evaluated using finite element analysis of patient-specific computed tomography data: femoral-component case studyBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2007
- Projections of Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2007
- The Chetranjan Ranawat Award: Tibial Component Failure Mechanisms in Total Knee ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2004
- Alignment in total knee arthroplastyThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2004