Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: Two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate
Open Access
- 19 March 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal Of Cancer
- Vol. 44 (6), 798-807
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.02.016
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Additional Double Reading of Screening Mammograms by Radiologic Technologists: Impact on Screening Performance ParametersJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2007
- Influence of Computer-Aided Detection on Performance of Screening MammographyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Improved Cancer Detection Using Computer-Aided Detection with Diagnostic and Screening Mammography: Prospective Study of 104 CancersAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2006
- Konsensuelles Zweitbefunden von Mammographien in der PraxisRöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren, 2004
- Recall and detection rates in screening mammographyCancer, 2004
- Double read screening mammograms: the use of a third reader to arbitrate on disagreementsThe Breast, 1999
- Scottish experience of double reading in the National Breast Screening ProgrammeThe Breast, 1998
- Mammography screening: an incremental cost effectiveness analysis of double versus single reading of mammogramsBMJ, 1996
- Impact of independent double reading of mammograms from the inception of a population-based breast cancer screening programmeThe Breast, 1995
- Comparison of single reading with double reading of mammograms, and change in effectiveness with experienceThe British Journal of Radiology, 1995