Revascularization treatment of stable coronary artery disease
- 13 January 2011
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Informa Healthcare in Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy
- Vol. 12 (2), 195-212
- https://doi.org/10.1517/14656566.2010.517522
Abstract
Introduction: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of mortality in developed countries. Angina, myocardial infarction, heart failure and other clinical manifestations of coronary atherosclerosis lead to considerable patient morbidity and constitute an increasingly heavy burden on health systems worldwide. Areas covered: This article reviews the recent major developments in the treatment of CAD, which can be achieved using medical therapy either in isolation or in combination with revascularization, performed via coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There is no dispute that optimal medical treatment is the cornerstone of CAD management; however, timely revascularization offers superior symptom control in patients with severe symptoms and may also offer a survival advantage in some patients with diffuse disease and diabetes. Importantly, the advances in PCI technology, especially with the introduction of drug-eluting stents has narrowed the gap between CABG and PCI for the treatment of CAD. Expert opinion: The continuous developments in diagnosis and treatment of CAD call for contemporary trials with detailed analysis to provide evidence that will help in the choice of the best and most cost-effective treatment strategy.Keywords
This publication has 91 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of sirolimus-eluting and bare metal stent for treatment of patients with total coronary occlusions: results of the GISSOC II-GISE multicentre randomized trialEuropean Heart Journal, 2010
- Randomized Trial of Simple Versus Complex Drug-Eluting Stenting for Bifurcation LesionsCirculation, 2010
- A Randomized Trial of Therapies for Type 2 Diabetes and Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Percutaneous coronary interventions for non-acute coronary artery disease: a quantitative 20-year synopsis and a network meta-analysisThe Lancet, 2009
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for Severe Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Stenting and Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Artery DiseaseCirculation, 2008
- Meta-analysis of minimally invasive internal thoracic artery bypass versus percutaneous revascularisation for isolated lesions of the left anterior descending arteryBMJ, 2007
- Impact of Completeness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Revascularization on Long-Term Outcomes in the Stent EraCirculation, 2006
- One year comparison of costs of coronary surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in the stent or surgery trialHeart, 2004
- Nonoperative Dilatation of Coronary-Artery StenosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979