ROUTINE OR INDICATED OPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY?
- 1 October 1980
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Anz Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 50 (5), 481-483
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1980.tb04174.x
Abstract
An assessment was made both the reliability of routine operative cholangiography and of the incidence of unsuspected common duct stones identified by this technique. It is suggested that its disadvantages, in particular the incidence of unnecessary bile duct explorations consequent upon false-positive cholangiograms, make routine operative cholangiography undesirable. If any suspicion of common duct stone exists by virtue of clinical, biochemical or operative findings, an operative cholangiogram should be performed. Following adoption of this policy our findings suggest that the incidence of undetected stone will be negligible.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- 1,000 cholecystectomies, extraductal palpation, and operative cholangiographyThe American Journal of Surgery, 1976
- Operative cholangiography: A reappraisal based on a review of 400 cholangiogramsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1975
- The Operative Cholangiogram:Its Interpretation, Accuracy and Value in Association with CholecystectomyAnnals of Surgery, 1974
- Routine Operative CholangiographyArchives of Surgery, 1973
- Operative Cholangiography in the Surgery of Gallstones: Implementation of a Policy Decision in a Consecutive Series of 327 PatientsAnz Journal of Surgery, 1972
- Routine operative cholangiographyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1970
- Routine Operative CholangiographyAnnals of Surgery, 1961
- An Evaluation of Operative Cholangiograms as a Guide to Common Duct ExplorationAnnals of Surgery, 1959
- OPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHYAnnals of Surgery, 1951
- OPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHYAnnals of Surgery, 1951