Animal models for the study of prostate carcinogenesis

Abstract

Human prostate carcinogenesis has been viewed as a multi‐step process involving progression from low histologic grade, small, latent carcinoma to large, higher grade, metastasizing carcinoma. However, recent data suggest that a variety of pathogenetic pathways may exist. The precise etiology and pathogenesis of human prostate cancer remain largely undefined. It is difficult to investigate stages in the development of human prostate cancer, but some animal models provide opportunities in this regard. Short‐term treatment of rats with chemical carcinogens produces a low incidence (5–15%) of prostate cancer, provided that prostatic cell proliferation is enhanced during carcinogen exposure. Chronic treatment with testosterone also produces a low prostate carcinoma incidence. A high carcinoma incidence can only be produced by chronic treatment with testosterone following administration of carcinogens such as N‐methyl‐N‐nitrosourea (MNU) and 3,2′‐dimethyl‐4‐aminobiphenyl (DMAB). Testosterone markedly enhances prostate carcinogenesis even at doses that do not measurably increase circulating testosterone. Thus, testosterone is a strong tumor promoter for the rat prostate. All such MNU‐or DMAB‐initiated and/or testosterone‐promoted tumors are adenocarcinomas; most originate from the dorsolateral and anterior, but not ventral, prostate lobes. These tumors share a number of important characteristics with human prostate cancer. A high frequency (70%) of activation of the K‐ras gene by a G³⁵ to A mutation occurs in these carcinomas. Another high incidence prostate carcinogenesis model, representing a different pathogenetic pathway, involves chronic administration of estradiol‐17β to rats in combination with low‐dose testosterone. The resulting carcinomas are low‐grade and originate exclusively from periurethral ducts of the dorsolateral and anterior prostate. While it is unknown whether testosterone is a tumor promoter in this system, preliminary studies indicate the formation of a DNA adduct in the target tissue, which suggests that estradiol‐17β acts as a tumor initiating agent in this system. The high incidence models mentioned earlier are adequate for the study of chemoprevention of prostatic carcinogenesis. Analysis of shifts in the relative incidence of metastasizing carcinoma, grossly apparent but not‐metastasizing carcinoma, microscopic‐size carcinoma, and carcinoma in situ or atypical hyperplasia may allow study of the modifying effects of potential chemopreventive agents on tumor progression in these animal models of prostatic carcinogenesis.