Inflammatory back pain in ankylosing spondylitis: A reassessment of the clinical history for application as classification and diagnostic criteria
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 30 January 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Vol. 54 (2), 569-578
- https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21619
Abstract
Objective Back pain associated with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is referred to as inflammatory back pain (IBP). The value of the clinical history in differentiating IBP from mechanical low back pain (MLBP) has been investigated in only a few studies. In this exploratory study, we sought to evaluate the individual features of IBP and to compose and compare various combinations of features for use as classification and diagnostic criteria. Methods We assessed the clinical history of 213 patients (101 with AS and 112 with MLBP) younger than 50 years who had chronic back pain. Single clinical parameters and combinations of parameters were compared between the AS and MLBP patient groups. Results Morning stiffness of >30 minutes' duration, age at onset of back pain, no improvement in back pain with rest, awakening because of back pain during the second half of the night only, alternating buttock pain, and time period of the onset of back pain were identified as independent contributors to IBP. Importantly, none of the single parameters sufficiently differentiated AS from MLBP. In contrast, several sets of combined parameters proved to be well balanced between sensitivity and specificity. Among these, a new candidate set of criteria for IBP, which consisted of morning stiffness of >30 minutes' duration, improvement in back pain with exercise but not with rest, awakening because of back pain during the second half of the night only, and alternating buttock pain, yielded a sensitivity of 70.3% and a specificity of 81.2% if at least 2 of these 4 parameters were fulfilled (positive likelihood ratio 3.7). If at least 3 of the 4 parameters were fulfilled, the positive likelihood ratio increased to 12.4. Conclusion A new set of criteria for IBP performed better than previous criteria in AS patients with established disease. A prospective study is needed to validate the diagnostic properties of the new candidate criteria set in patients with early disease.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- INFLAMMATORY BACK PAIN IN PRIMARY CARERheumatology, 1995
- On the Accuracy of History, Physical Examination, and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate in Diagnosing Low Back Pain in General PracticeSpine, 1995
- Users' Guides to the Medical LiteratureJAMA, 1994
- Occurrence of Spinal Pain Syndromes in a Group of Apparently Healthy and Physically Fit Sportsmen (Orienteers)Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, 1988
- An epidemiological survey of the signs and symptoms of ankylosing spondylitisClinical Rheumatology, 1985
- Evaluation of Diagnostic Criteria for Ankylosing SpondylitisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1984
- The risk of developing ankylosing spondylitis in HLA‐B27 positive individualsArthritis & Rheumatism, 1984
- Clinical symptoms and signs useful in the early diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitisClinical Rheumatology, 1983
- How Does Bechterew's Syndrome (Ankylosing Spondylitis) Start?: Interrelations between Onset of SymptomsScandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, 1983
- The Prevalence and Nature of Back Pain in an Industrial ComplexSpine, 1980