Are surfaces elastically softer or stiffer?
Top Cited Papers
- 15 March 2004
- journal article
- Published by AIP Publishing in Applied Physics Letters
- Vol. 84 (11), 1940-1942
- https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1682698
Abstract
This letter addresses the issue of surface softening versus stiffening during elastic deformation. Using a combination of molecular statics and ab initio calculations, we show that a solid surface can be either softer or stiffer elastically than the corresponding bulk. Whether a particular surface is softer or stiffer depends on the competition between atomic coordination and electron redistribution (which sometimes is referred as bond saturation) on the surface. Taking Cu as an example, we demonstrate that the Young’s modulus along 〈110〉 direction on {100} surface is larger than its bulk counterpart; meanwhile, it is smaller along 〈100〉 direction on {100} surface.This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Local elastic constants in thin films of an fcc crystalPhysical Review E, 2003
- Size-dependent elastic moduli of platelike nanomaterialsJournal of Applied Physics, 2003
- Structural stability and lattice defects in copper:Ab initio, tight-binding, and embedded-atom calculationsPhysical Review B, 2001
- Size-dependent elastic properties of nanosized structural elementsNanotechnology, 2000
- Generalized Gradient Approximation Made SimplePhysical Review Letters, 1996
- Soft self-consistent pseudopotentials in a generalized eigenvalue formalismPhysical Review B, 1990
- New empirical approach for the structure and energy of covalent systemsPhysical Review B, 1988
- Stresses in semiconductors:Ab initiocalculations on Si, Ge, and GaAsPhysical Review B, 1985
- Embedded-atom method: Derivation and application to impurities, surfaces, and other defects in metalsPhysical Review B, 1984
- Special points for Brillouin-zone integrationsPhysical Review B, 1976