A High-Volume Specialist Palliative Care Unit and Team May Reduce In-Hospital End-of-Life Care Costs
- 1 October 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Journal of Palliative Medicine
- Vol. 6 (5), 699-705
- https://doi.org/10.1089/109662103322515202
Abstract
Background: Current end-of-life hospital care can be of poor quality and high cost. High volume and/or specialist care, and standardized care with clinical practice guidelines, has improved outcomes and costs in other areas of cancer care. Methods: The objective of this study was to measure the impact of the palliative care unit (PCU) on the cost of care. The PCU is a dedicated 11-bed inpatient (PCU) staffed by a high-volume specialist team using standardized care. We compared daily charges and costs of the days prior to PCU transfer to the stay in the PCU, for patients who died in the first 6 months after the PCU opened May 2000. We performed a case-control study by matching 38 PCU patients by diagnosis and age to contemporary patients who died outside the PCU cared for by other medical or surgical teams, to adjust for potential differences in the patients or goals of care. Results: The unit admitted 237 patients from May to December 2000. Fifty-two percent had cancer followed by vascular events, immunodeficiency, or organ failure. For the 123 patients with both non-PCU and PCU days, daily charges and costs were reduced by 66% overall and 74% in "other" (medications, diagnostics, etc.) after transfer to the PCU (p < 0.0001 for all). Comparing the 38 contemporary control patients who died outside the PCU to similar patients who died in the PCU, daily charges were 59% lower ($5,304 ± 5,850 to $2,172 ± 2,250, p = 0.005), direct costs 56% lower ($1,441 ± 1,438 to $632 ± 690, p = 0.004), and total costs 57% lower ($2,538 ± 2,918 to $1,095 ± 1,153, p = 0.009). Conclusions: Appropriate standardized care of medically complex terminally ill patients in a high-volume, specialized unit may significantly lower cost. These results should be confirmed in a randomized study but such studies are difficult to perform.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ensuring Quality Cancer Care by the Use of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Critical PathwaysJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- Controlling Health Care ExpendituresNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- The Impact of a Regional Palliative Care Program on the Cost of Palliative Care DeliveryJournal of Palliative Medicine, 2000
- Is Economic Hardship on the Families of the Seriously Ill Associated With Patient and Surrogate Care Preferences?Archives of Internal Medicine, 1996
- A randomized controlled trial of the cost-effectiveness of a district co-ordinating service for terminally ill cancer patientsPalliative Medicine, 1996
- A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal InvestigatorsJAMA, 1995
- Medicare Payments from Diagnosis to Death for Elderly Cancer Patients by Stage at DiagnosisMedical Care, 1995
- The Economics of Dying -- The Illusion of Cost Savings at the End of LifeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Trends in Medicare Payments in the Last Year of LifeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Randomised controlled trial of effects of coordinating care for terminally ill cancer patients.BMJ, 1992