Why Is There A Quality Chasm?
- 1 July 2002
- journal article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 21 (4), 13-25
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.21.4.13
Abstract
Medical care seems to obtain less value from the resources it uses than other industries do, a phenomenon not limited to the United States. I explore several reasons for this, including consumers' ignorance, the rate of technological change, the widespread use of administered pricing, the difficulty of appraising a given provider's quality, and the role of the public sector with objectives other than efficiency. Although these causes suggest that the performance of medical care may always lag behind that of other industries, greater use of information technology and improved financial incentives will help to reduce the size of the quality chasm.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- International Productivity Comparisons Built from the Firm LevelJournal of Economic Perspectives, 2001
- Benefits and Hazards of Reporting Medical Outcomes PubliclyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Variation in the Use of Cardiac Procedures after Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Frontier estimation: How useful a tool for health economics?Journal of Health Economics, 1994
- Maintaining Hospital QualityJAMA, 1993
- Relation between Malpractice Claims and Adverse Events Due to NegligenceNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Does Inappropriate Use Explain Geographic Variations in the Use of Health Care Services?JAMA, 1987
- Cost-sharing and provider choiceJournal of Health Economics, 1985
- Small-Area Variations in the Use of Common Surgical Procedures: An International Comparison of New England, England, and NorwayNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structureJournal of Financial Economics, 1976