A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation
Top Cited Papers
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Environmental and Resource Economics
- Vol. 30 (3), 313-325
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-004-3332-z
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation MethodAmerican Economic Review, 1999
- CVM‐X: Calibrating Contingent Values with Experimental Auction MarketsAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1998
- Using Donation Mechanisms to Value Nonuse Benefits from Public GoodsJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1997
- REAL AND HYPOTHETICAL WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION: A NON‐EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISONJournal of Agricultural Economics, 1997
- Contingent Valuation and Revealed Preference Methodologies: Comparing the Estimates for Quasi-Public GoodsLand Economics, 1996
- EMPIRICAL TESTS OF HYPOTHETICAL BIAS IN CONSUMERS' SURPLUS SURVEYSAustralian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1988
- Market Transactions and Hypothetical Demand Data: A Comparative StudyJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1987
- The Concept of Value in Resource AllocationLand Economics, 1984
- Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased?American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1979
- Estimating demand for public goods: An experimentEuropean Economic Review, 1972