Mass spectrometry and combinatorial chemistry: a short outline
- 1 December 2001
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Mass Spectrometry
- Vol. 36 (12), 1249-1259
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jms.238
Abstract
The rapid evolution of combinatorial chemistry in recent years has led to a dramatic improvement in synthetic capabilities. The goal is to accelerate the discovery of molecules showing affinity against a target, such as an enzyme or a receptor, through the simultaneous synthesis of a great number of structurally diverse compounds. This is done by generating combinatorial libraries containing as many as hundreds or thousands of compounds. The need to test all these compounds led to the development of high‐throughput screening (HTS) techniques, and also high‐throughput analytical techniques capable of assessing the occurrence, structure and purity of the products. In order to be applied effectively to the characterization of combinatorial libraries, an analytical technique must be adequately sensitive (to analyse samples which are typically produced in nanomole amounts or less), fast, affordable and easy to automate (to minimize analysis time and operator intervention). Although no method alone can meet all the analytical challenges underlying this task, the recent progress in mass spectrometric (MS) instrumentation renders this technique an essential tool for scientists working in this area. We describe here relevant aspects of the use of MS in combinatorial technologies, such as current methods of characterization, purification and screening of libraries. Some examples from our laboratory deal with the analysis of pooled oligomeric libraries containing n × 324(n = 1, 2) compounds, using both on‐line high‐performance liquid chromatography/MS with an ion trap mass spectrometer, and direct infusion into a triple quadrupole instrument. In the first approach, MS and product ion MS/MS with automatic selection of the precursor were performed in one run, allowing library confirmation and structural elucidation of unexpected by‐products. The second approach used MS scans to characterize the entire library and also precursor ion and neutral loss scans to detect selectively components with given structural characteristics. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Combinatorial Chemistry and Mass Spectrometry in the 21st Century Drug Discovery LaboratoryChemical Reviews, 2001
- Mass spectrometry in combinatorial chemistryMass Spectrometry Reviews, 2000
- A Comparison of Various FTIR and FT Raman Methods: Applications in the Reaction Optimization Stage of Combinatorial ChemistryJournal of Combinatorial Chemistry, 1998
- Analytical techniques for solid-phase organic and combinatorial synthesisDrug Discovery Today, 1997
- Quantitation of combinatorial libraries of small organic molecules by normal-phase HPLC with evaporative light-scattering detectionMolecular Diversity, 1996
- A single-bead decode strategy using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and a new photolabile linker: 3-Amino-3-(2-nitrophenyl)propionic acidMolecular Diversity, 1995
- Characterization of the Complexity of Small-Molecule Libraries by Electrospray Ionization Mass SpectrometryAnalytical Chemistry, 1995
- Delayed extraction matrix‐assisted laser desorption time‐of‐flight mass spectrometryRapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 1995
- Direct polarization carbon-13 and proton magic angle spinning NMR in the characterization of solvent-swollen gelsMacromolecules, 1989
- Laser desorption ionization of proteins with molecular masses exceeding 10,000 daltonsAnalytical Chemistry, 1988