A multifaceted strategy for implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules in two emergency departments
Open Access
- 12 August 2009
- Vol. 339 (aug12 3), b3056
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3056
Abstract
Problem Despite widespread acceptance of the Ottawa ankle rules for assessment of acute ankle injuries, their application varies considerably. Design Before and after study. Background and setting Emergency departments of a tertiary teaching hospital and a community hospital in Australia. Key measures for improvement Documentation of the Ottawa ankle rules, proportion of patients referred for radiography, proportion of radiographs showing a fracture. Strategies for change Education, a problem specific radiography request form, reminders, audit and feedback, and using radiographers as “gatekeepers.” Effects of change Documentation of the Ottawa ankle rules improved from 57.5% to 94.7% at the tertiary hospital, and 51.6% to 80.8% at the community hospital (PLessons learnt Assessment of case note documentation has limitations. Clinician groups seem to differ in their capacity and willingness to change their practice. A multifaceted change strategy including a problem specific radiography request form can improve the selection of patients for radiography.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical Decision Rules "in the Real World": How a Widely Disseminated Rule Is Used in Everyday PracticeAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2005
- Diffusion of innovation theory for clinical changeThe Medical Journal of Australia, 2004
- Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategiesHealth Technology Assessment, 2004
- The case for knowledge translation: shortening the journey from evidence to effectBMJ, 2003
- Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic reviewBMJ, 2003
- No Magic Targets! Changing Clinical Practice To Become More Evidence BasedHealth Care Management Review, 2002
- Successes and Failures in the Implementation of Evidence-Based Guidelines for Clinical PracticeMedical Care, 2001
- An analysis of the causes of adverse events from the Quality in Australian Health Care StudyThe Medical Journal of Australia, 1999
- Personal paper: Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practiceBMJ, 1997
- Persuasive Communication and Medical Technology AssessmentArchives of Internal Medicine, 1985