Will My Patient Fall?
Top Cited Papers
- 3 January 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 297 (1), 77-86
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.1.77
Abstract
ContextEffective multifactorial interventions reduce the frequent falling rate of older patients by 30% to 40%. However, clinical consensus suggests reserving these interventions for high-risk patients. Limiting fall prevention programs to high-risk patients implies that clinicians must recognize features that predict future falls.ObjectiveTo identify the prognostic value of risk factors for future falls among older patients.Data Sources and Study SelectionSearch of MEDLINE (1966-September 2004), CINAHL (1982-September 2004), and authors' own files to identify prospective cohort studies of risk factors for falls that performed a multivariate analysis of such factors.Data ExtractionTwo reviewers independently determined inclusion of articles and assessed study quality. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. Included studies were those identifying the prognostic value of risk factors for future falls among community-dwelling persons 65 years and older. Clinically identifiable risk factors were identified across 6 domains: orthostatic hypotension, visual impairment, impairment of gait or balance, medication use, limitations in basic or instrumental activities of daily living, and cognitive impairment.Data SynthesisEighteen studies met inclusion criteria and provided a multivariate analysis including at least 1 of the risk factor domains. The estimated pretest probability of falling at least once in any given year for individuals 65 years and older was 27% (95% confidence interval, 19%-36%). Patients who have fallen in the past year are more likely to fall again [likelihood ratio range, 2.3-2.8]. The most consistent predictors of future falls are clinically detected abnormalities of gait or balance (likelihood ratio range, 1.7-2.4). Visual impairment, medication variables, decreased activities of daily living, and impaired cognition did not consistently predict falls across studies. Orthostatic hypotension did not predict falls after controlling for other factors.ConclusionsScreening for risk of falling during the clinical examination begins with determining if the patient has fallen in the past year. For patients who have not previously fallen, screening consists of an assessment of gait and balance. Patients who have fallen or who have a gait or balance problem are at higher risk of future falls.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interventions for preventing falls in elderly peopleCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2009
- In Search of Fewer Independent Risk FactorsArchives of Internal Medicine, 2005
- Interventions for the prevention of falls in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trialsBMJ, 2004
- The epidemiology of falls and syncopeClinics in Geriatric Medicine, 2002
- Is This Patient Hypovolemic?JAMA, 1999
- Drugs and Falls in Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis: I. Psychotropic DrugsJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1999
- Falls, Injuries Due to Falls, and the Risk of Admission to a Nursing HomeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Warning on inaccurate Rosenbaum cards for testing near visionSurvey of Ophthalmology, 1997
- Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypotension, pure autonomic failure and multiple system atrophyClinical Autonomic Research, 1996
- Performance‐Oriented Assessment of Mobility Problems in Elderly PatientsJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1986