Production and Stabilization of Real-Time Task Schedules
- 1 July 1967
- journal article
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) in Journal of the ACM
- Vol. 14 (3), 439-465
- https://doi.org/10.1145/321406.321408
Abstract
A model for multiprocessor control is considered in which jobs are broken into various pieces, called tasks . Tasks are executed by single processing units. In this paper the structure controlling the assignment of tasks to processors is the task list, which orders all tasks according to servicing priority. When a processors becomes free, it simply picks up the highest priority task that is executable at that moment. The job and its component tasks are imagined to be interacting with an environment consisting of a set of rigid timing constraints . Such constraints are of two types, called start-times and deadlines . The interaction is specified by requiring that certain distinguished tasks conform directly to one or more of these constraints. Tasks conforming to a start-time cannot begin until the start-time has passed, and tasks conforming to a deadline cannot proceed beyond the deadline. In our model, all tasks have known maximum run-times, but in any particular job execution, task run-times are unknown. It is shown that despite the simplicity of this control scheme some peculiar phenomena result. Most of these phenomena were first noticed by P. Richards in 1960. A simulation study (Appendix I) reveals that they may be very common in practice. In the present paper and a companion paper by R. L. Graham [ Bell Syst. Tech. J. 45 (1966), 1563-1581] a coherent theory of task-list control is developed, in which the nature of these peculiarities is brought under systematic study. A number of potentially useful results are derived.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- SNOBOL , A String Manipulation LanguageJournal of the ACM, 1964
- Sequencing Aspects of MultiprogrammingJournal of the ACM, 1961
- Multiprogram schedulingCommunications of the ACM, 1960
- Scheduling with Deadlines and Loss FunctionsManagement Science, 1959