Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses
Top Cited Papers
- 22 July 2010
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 25 (9), 603-605
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mobile Phone Use and Risk of Tumors: A Meta-AnalysisJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- Association between Metabolic Syndrome and Risk of Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort StudiesCerebrovascular Diseases, 2008
- Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliographyInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2007
- Cellular Phones, Cordless Phones, and the Risks of Glioma and Meningioma (Interphone Study Group, Germany)American Journal of Epidemiology, 2006
- Evaluating non-randomised intervention studiesHealth Technology Assessment, 2003
- Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in EpidemiologyA Proposal for ReportingJAMA, 2000
- The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysisJAMA, 1999
- An empirical investigation on matching in published case–control studiesEuropean Journal of Epidemiology, 1998
- Theoretical Epidemiology: Principles of Occurrence Research in Medicine.Published by JSTOR ,1987
- THE EFFECT OF RESPONSE BIAS ON THE ODDS RATIOAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1981