The relation of moral judgement to authoritarianism, sexism, ethnocentrism, and concern about nuclear war
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Moral Education
- Vol. 19 (1), 38-47
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724900190105
Abstract
This study focuses on the relation between moral arguments and political attitudes such as concern about nuclear war, sexism, attitudes toward minority groups, and authoritarianism. Forty‐six high school students were involved in a quantitative study based upon tests and questionnaires, and 19 of them participated in a qualitative study based on interviews. The measures were: the ‘Sociomoral Reflection Objective Measure’, the ‘Inventory of Nuclear War Attitudes’, the Slade and Jenner sexism scale, an ethnocentrism scale, and a Dutch version of the F‐scale. Using a multivariate analysis it was shown that concern about nuclear war and ethnocentrism are particularly related to moral judgement level. The qualitative study illustrates the context of these relationships.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Moral Judgment, Authoritarianism, and EthnocentrismThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1989
- Moral Judgment and Concern about Nuclear WarYouth & Society, 1987
- Construction and Validation of a Multiple-Choice Measure of Moral ReasoningChild Development, 1984
- The relationship between moral reasoning and political orientation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983
- Validation of a Questionnaire Measuring Attitudes toward Females' Social Roles for a Dutch PopulationPsychological Reports, 1982
- Questionnaire Measuring Attitudes to Females' Social RolesPsychological Reports, 1978
- Ego developmental aspects of New Left ideology.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974
- A Theory of JusticePublished by Harvard University Press ,1971