The development of undergraduate curricula in surgery: III. Assessment
- 26 March 2001
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Anz Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 71 (3), 178-183
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1622.2001.02031.x
Abstract
The present review is aimed at providing an overview of the assessment process. The mode of assessment has a powerful influence on the learning behaviour of students. It is therefore important to ensure that there is congruity between the objective, the task and the test. In other words: define it, teach it, examine it. It is difficult to evaluate many of the attributes that we desire in a doctor; and examples of this include empathy, ethical behaviour, problem‐solving skills, ability to self‐educate and teamwork. Nevertheless, it is generally agreed that it is better to measure uncertainly the significant than to measure reliably and validly the trivial. Furthermore different methods of assessment suit different educational objectives (fitness for purpose) and this supports the use of multiple assessment techniques.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Program Directorsʼ Responses to a Survey on Variables Used to Select Residents in a Time of ChangeJournal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 1999
- Assessing residents' clinical performance: Cumulative results of a four-year study with the Objective Structured Clinical ExaminationSurgery, 1998
- The emperorʼs new clothesAcademic Medicine, 1996
- The Objective Structured Clinical Examination The New Gold Standard for Evaluating Postgraduate Clinical PerformanceAnnals of Surgery, 1995
- Validity of three clinical performance assessments of internal medicine clerksAcademic Medicine, 1995
- UNDERSTANDING THE OBJECTlVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAMINATIONAnz Journal of Surgery, 1995
- How can we test clinical reasoning?The Lancet, 1995
- Extended‐matching items: A practical alternative to free‐response questionsTeaching and Learning in Medicine, 1993
- The observed long-case in clinical assessmentMedical Education, 1991