The effect of a quantitative resuscitation strategy on mortality in patients with sepsis: A meta-analysis*
- 1 October 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 36 (10), 2734-2739
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e318186f839
Abstract
Objective: Quantitative resuscitation consists of structured cardiovascular intervention targeting predefined hemodynamic end points. We sought to measure the treatment effect of quantitative resuscitation on mortality from sepsis. Data Sources: We conducted a systematic review of the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, conference proceedings, clinical practice guidelines, and other sources using a comprehensive strategy. Study Selection: We identified randomized control trials comparing quantitative resuscitation with standard resuscitation in adult patients who were diagnosed with sepsis using standard criteria. The primary outcome variable was mortality. Data Abstraction: Three authors independently extracted data and assessed study quality using standardized instruments; consensus was reached by conference. Preplanned subgroup analysis required studies to be categorized based on early (at the time of diagnosis) vs. late resuscitation implementation. We used the chi-square test and I2 to assess for statistical heterogeneity (p < 0.10, I2 > 25%). The primary analysis was based on the random effects model to produce pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Results: The search yielded 29 potential publications; nine studies were included in the final analysis, providing a sample of 1001 patients. The combined results demonstrate a decrease in mortality (odds ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.43–0.96); however, there was statistically significant heterogeneity (p = 0.07, I2 = 45%). Among the early quantitative resuscitation studies (n = 6) there was minimal heterogeneity (p = 0.40, I2 = 2.4%) and a significant decrease in mortality (odds ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.37–0.69). The late quantitative resuscitation studies (n = 3) demonstrated no significant effect on mortality (odds ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval 0.60–2.22). Conclusion: This meta-analysis found that applying an early quantitative resuscitation strategy to patients with sepsis imparts a significant reduction in mortality.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008Critical Care Medicine, 2008
- Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008Intensive Care Medicine, 2007
- Prospective External Validation of the Clinical Effectiveness of an Emergency Department-Based Early Goal-Directed Therapy Protocol for Severe Sepsis and Septic ShockChest, 2007
- Hemodynamic goals in randomized clinical trials in patients with sepsis: a systematic review of the literatureCritical Care, 2007
- Implementation and outcomes of the Multiple Urgent Sepsis Therapies (MUST) protocol*Critical Care Medicine, 2006
- Doing New Research? Don't Forget the OldPLoS Medicine, 2004
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Relationship of mortality to increasing oxygen delivery in patients >or=to50 years of ageCritical Care Medicine, 1998
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Definitions for Sepsis and Organ Failure and Guidelines for the Use of Innovative Therapies in SepsisChest, 1992