Treatment for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Risk of Preterm Delivery
Top Cited Papers
- 5 May 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 291 (17), 2100-2106
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.17.2100
Abstract
Research from JAMA — Treatment for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Risk of Preterm Delivery — ContextIt is unclear whether treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) increase the subsequent risk of preterm delivery. Most studies have lacked sufficient sample size, mixed heterogeneous subtypes of preterm delivery, and failed to control for confounding factors.ObjectiveTo determine whether cervical laser and loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) treatments increase risk of preterm delivery and its subtypes.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsRetrospective cohort study conducted among women evaluated at a colposcopy clinic serving Auckland, New Zealand (1988-2000), comparing delivery outcomes of untreated women (n = 426) and those treated (n = 652) with laser conization, laser ablation, or LEEP. Record linkage using unique health identifiers identified women who had subsequent deliveries.Main Outcome MeasuresTotal preterm delivery and its subtypes, spontaneous labor and premature rupture of membranes before 37 weeks' gestation (pPROM).ResultsThe overall rate of preterm delivery was 13.8%. The rate of pPROM was 6.2% and the rate of spontaneous preterm delivery was 3.8%. Analyses showed no significant increase in risk of total preterm delivery (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8-1.5) or spontaneous preterm delivery (aRR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.7-2.6) for any treatment. Risk of pPROM was significantly increased following treatment with laser conization (aRR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.3-5.6) or LEEP (aRR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.0-3.8), but not laser ablation (aRR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.5-2.4). Moreover, risk of pPROM and total preterm delivery increased significantly with increasing height of tissue removed from the cervix in conization. Women in the highest tertile of cone height (≥1.7 cm) had a greater than 3-fold increase in risk of pPROM compared with untreated women (aRR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.8-7.5).ConclusionsLEEP and laser cone treatments were associated with significantly increased risk of pPROM. Careful consideration should be given to treatment of CIN in women of reproductive age, especially when treatment might reasonably be delayed or targeted to high-risk cases.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Duration of Pregnancy After Carbon Dioxide Laser Conization of the Cervix: Influence of Cone HeightPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1997
- Pregnancy outcome after laser surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasiaActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1996
- Obstetrical prognosis for carbon dioxide laser conisation of the uterine cervixEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1995
- A Randomized Prospective Study Comparing Three Techniques of Conization: Cold Knife, Laser, and LEEPGynecologic Oncology, 1994
- Pregnancy outcome after large loop excision of the cervical transformation zoneAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1993
- The outcome of pregnancy after CO2 laser conisation of the cervixBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1993
- Obstetric outcome after cervical surgery for intra-epithelial neoplasiaJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1992
- Outcome of pregnancy after cone biopsy — A case-control studyEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1982
- THE OUTCOME OF PREGNANCY AFTER CONE BIOPSY OF THE CERVIX: A CASE‐CONTROL STUDYBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1979
- Pregnancy Complications Following Conization of the Uterine Cervix (II)Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1979