A Review of Domestic Violence Risk Instruments
- 1 April 2000
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
- Vol. 1 (2), 171-181
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838000001002004
Abstract
The problem of domestic violence has been well documented with respect to its social, psychological, and economic costs. Proactive arrest and sentencing policies have resulted in an increasing, and in some cases, overwhelming number of spousal batterers being processed through the criminal justice system. Scarce correctional and treatment resources necessitate that difficult decisions be made about the management of domestic violence perpetrators. In an effort to make better decisions, many jurisdictions have adopted a risk assessment approach. Spousal assault risk assessment now serves to inform those making decisions about sentencing (e.g., community release vs. incarceration), treatment placement, and supervision intensity. With these developments, researchers and clinicians have begun to discuss the appropriate content and process of spousal assault risk assessment. There have been a number of efforts in recent years to develop theoretically and scientifically sound risk assessment instruments and procedures. This article attempts to review state-of-the-art instruments in this rapidly expanding field.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predicting Repeat Abuse Among Arrested BatterersJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 2000
- Violence risk assessment: Science and practiceLegal and Criminological Psychology, 1999
- Modus Operandi and Personality Disorder in Incarcerated Spousal KillersInternational Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 1999
- Perpetrator Personality Effects on Post-Separation Victim Reactions in Abusive RelationshipsJournal of Family Violence, 1999
- Wife Assault Treatment and Criminal Recidivism: An 11-Year Follow-UpInternational Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 1997
- Improving the clinical practice of violence risk assessment: Technology, guidelines, and training.American Psychologist, 1996
- Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical–statistical controversy.Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1996
- A scale for measuring propensity for abusivenessJournal of Family Violence, 1995
- Men Who Abuse Their SpousesJournal of Offender Counseling Services Rehabilitation, 1990
- A research scale for the assessment of psychopathy in criminal populationsPersonality and Individual Differences, 1980