Public and Biobank Participant Attitudes toward Genetic Research Participation and Data Sharing
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 15 January 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Public Health Genomics
- Vol. 13 (6), 368-377
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000276767
Abstract
Research assessing attitudes toward consent processes for high-throughput genomic-wide technologies and widespread sharing of data is limited. In order to develop a better understanding of stakeholder views toward these issues, this cross-sectional study assessed public and biorepository participant attitudes toward research participation and sharing of genetic research data. Forty-nine individuals participated in 6 focus groups; 28 in 3 public focus groups and 21 in 3 NUgene biorepository participant focus groups. In the public focus groups, 75% of participants were women, 75% had some college education or more, 46% were African-American and 29% were Hispanic. In the NUgene focus groups, 67% of participants were women, 95% had some college education or more, and the majority (76%) of participants was Caucasian. Five major themes were identified in the focus group data: (a) a wide spectrum of understanding of genetic research; (b) pros and cons of participation in genetic research; (c) influence of credibility and trust of the research institution; (d) concerns about sharing genetic research data and need for transparency in the Policy for Sharing of Data in National Institutes of Health-Supported or Conducted Genome-Wide Association Studies; (e) a need for more information and education about genetic research. In order to increase public understanding and address potential concerns about genetic research, future efforts should be aimed at involving the public in genetic research policy development and in identifying or developing appropriate educational strategies to meet the public’s needs.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing the understanding of biobank participantsAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 2009
- Engaging the Public on Biobanks: Outcomes of the BC Biobank DeliberationPublic Health Genomics, 2008
- Population Genomics: The Public Population Project in Genomics (P3G): a proof of concept?European Journal of Human Genetics, 2008
- Research Ethics Recommendations for Whole-Genome Research: Consensus StatementPLoS Biology, 2008
- Great expectations: views of genetic research participants regarding current and future genetic studiesGenetics in Medicine, 2008
- DNA data sharing: research participants' perspectivesGenetics in Medicine, 2008
- The NCBI dbGaP database of genotypes and phenotypesNature Genetics, 2007
- Share and share alike: deciding how to distribute the scientific and social benefits of genomic dataNature Reviews Genetics, 2007
- Community Engagement in Genetic Research: Results of the First Public Consultation for the Quebec CARTaGENE ProjectPublic Health Genomics, 2007
- The National Institutes of Health Announces Online Availability of “Points to Consider When Planning a Genetic Study That Involves Members of Named Populations”American Journal of Human Genetics, 2002