Predictive value of statistical models
- 1 November 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 9 (11), 1303-1325
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780091109
Abstract
A review is given of different ways of estimating the error rate of a prediction rule based on a statistical model. A distinction is drawn between apparent, optimum and actual error rates. Moreover it is shown how cross-validation can be used to obtain an adjusted predictor with smaller error rate. A detailed discussion is given for ordinary least squares, logistic regression and Cox regression in survival analysis. Finally, the split-sample approach is discussed and demonstrated on two data sets.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- How Biased is the Apparent Error Rate of a Prediction Rule?Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1986
- Cross-Validation, the Jackknife, and the Bootstrap: Excess Error Estimation in Forward Logistic RegressionJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1986
- Estimating the Error Rate of a Prediction Rule: Improvement on Cross-ValidationJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1983
- How Many Variables Should Be Entered in a Regression Equation?Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1983
- The Use of Balanced Half-Sample Replication in Cross-Validation StudiesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1976
- The Predictive Sample Reuse Method with ApplicationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1975
- The Relationship Between Variable Selection and Data Agumentation and a Method for PredictionTechnometrics, 1974
- Mean Square Error of Prediction as a Criterion for Selecting VariablesTechnometrics, 1971
- Ridge Regression: Applications to Nonorthogonal ProblemsTechnometrics, 1970
- Ridge Regression: Biased Estimation for Nonorthogonal ProblemsTechnometrics, 1970