Fibrate‐induced increase in blood urea and creatinine: is gemfibrozil the only innocuous agent?
Open Access
- 1 December 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
- Vol. 15 (12), 1993-1999
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/15.12.1993
Abstract
Background. Some reports indicate that fibrates can induce renal dysfunction. However, the clinical characteristics of these episodes, and the respective nephrotoxicity of the four main fibrates used—namely, fenofibrate, bezafibrate, ciprofibrate, and gemfibrozil—remain ill defined. Methods. To better characterize this side‐effect, we first reviewed the charts of 27 patients from our institution who developed an impairment of renal function during fibrate therapy. We next analysed the articles (n=24) that contained data on renal function in patients taking fibrates (n=2676). Results. Among our 27 patients, 25 were on fenofibrate therapy, one was taking bezafibrate, and one ciprofibrate. Nineteen were recipients of solid‐organ transplants (kidney recipients, n=15; heart or heart‐lung recipients, n=4), and eight were non‐transplanted patients with some impairment of renal function. Baseline plasma creatinine ranged from 0.9 to 2.9 mg/dl. It increased by a mean of 40% after the start of fibrate therapy. There was a concomitant increase of blood urea values (mean 36%) in most of the patients. Renal function returned to baseline in 18/24 patients after fibrate discontinuation. However, six patients, all transplant recipients, experienced a permanent increase in plasma creatinine. The incidence of fibrate‐induced renal dysfunction among our series of kidney transplant recipients was 60%, as it occurred in 15 of the 25 patients who had ever taken fibrates. An increase of mean creatinine values during therapy was described in all papers on fenofibrate (n=7) and bezafibrate (n=8) (range 8–18% and 8–40% respectively), and in three of four papers dealing with ciprofibrate (range 6–16%). No significant renal impairment was described in any of the eight articles reporting data on gemfibrozil therapy. Conclusion. Therapy with fenofibrate, bezafibrate, and ciprofibrate may induce renal dysfunction. Gemfibrozil appears to be devoid of this side‐effect.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gemfibrozil for the Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease in Men with Low Levels of High-Density Lipoprotein CholesterolNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Hyperlipidemia in patients with chronic renal diseaseAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 1998
- Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)The Lancet, 1994
- THE LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF THE LIPID-LOWERING AGENT FENOFIBRATE IN HYPERLIPIDEMIC HEART TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTSTransplantation, 1994
- Creatinine rise after fibrate therapy in renal graft recipientsThe Lancet, 1993
- Pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine in hyperlipidaemic long-term survivors of heart transplantationEuropean Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1992
- Plasma triglyceride and coronary heart disease.Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis: A Journal of Vascular Biology, 1991
- THE PREVALENCE OF HYPERLIPIDEMIA IN RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTSTransplantation, 1990
- Comparative toxicity and safety profile of fenofibrate and other fibric acid derivativesAmerican Journal Of Medicine, 1987
- Helsinki Heart Study: Primary-Prevention Trial with Gemfibrozil in Middle-Aged Men with DyslipidemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987