An Estimate of the U.S. Government’s Undercount of Nonfatal Occupational Injuries
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
- Vol. 46 (1), 10-18
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jom.0000105909.66435.53
Abstract
Learning Objectives Estimate how many workers—and in which occupations—are presently excluded from the Bureau of Labor Statistics Annual Survey of Occupational Illnesses and Injuries. Consider possible reasons for under-reporting of injuries by private firms and their employees. Provide the best estimate of the degree of under-reporting, and note the possible consequences for workers’ health. Debate surrounds the size of the underestimate of nonfatal occupational injuries produced by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). We developed models that separated categories of injuries: BLS Annual Survey, federal government, agriculture, state and local government, self-employed outside agriculture, and all other. The models generated varying estimates depending on the assumptions for each category pertaining to job risks and amount of underreporting. We offered justification for the assumptions based on published studies as well as our own analyses of BLS data. The models suggested the Annual Survey missed from 0% to 70% of the number of injuries (from private firms, excluding the self-employed) it was designed to capture. However, when we included firms and governments the Annual Survey was not designed to capture, and considered reasonable assumptions regarding underreporting, we estimated the BLS missed between 33% and 69% of all injuries. We concluded that there was substantial undercapture in the BLS Annual Survey, some due to the excluded categories of government workers and the self-employed, as well as some due to underreporting.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Estimating deaths from industrial injury by capture-recapture: a cautionary taleInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2000
- Agricultural injuryAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine, 2000
- Some Problems with Value-of-Life Estimates Based on Labor Market DataJournal of Forensic Economics, 2000
- The Economic Burden of COPDChest, 2000
- Global Burden of Disease and Injury Due to Occupational FactorsEpidemiology, 1999
- Construction injury rates may exceed national estimates: Evidence from the construction of Denver International AirportAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1998
- Reporting of Industrial Accidents in the NetherlandsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1998
- Occupational injury and illness in the United States. Estimates of costs, morbidity, and mortalityArchives of Internal Medicine, 1997
- Estimating the costs of occupational injury in the United StatesAccident Analysis & Prevention, 1995
- Compliance with OSHA record-keeping requirements.American Journal of Public Health, 1988