Minimizing false positives in kinase virtual screens

Abstract

In spite of recent improvements in docking and scoring methods, high false‐positive rates remain a common issue in structure‐based virtual screening. In this study, the distinctive features of false positives in kinase virtual screens were investigated. A series of retrospective virtual screens on kinase targets was performed on specifically designed test sets, each combining true ligands and experimentally confirmed inactive compounds. A systematic analysis of the docking poses generated for the top‐ranking compounds highlighted key aspects differentiating true hits from false positives. The most recurring feature in the poses of false positives was the absence of certain key interactions known to be required for kinase binding. A systematic analysis of 444 crystal structures of ligand‐bound kinases showed that at least two hydrogen bonds between the ligand and the backbone protein atoms in the kinase hinge region are present in 90% of the complexes, with very little variability across targets. Closer inspection showed that when the two hydrogen bonds are present, one of three preferred hinge‐binding motifs is involved in 96.5% of the cases. Less than 10% of the false positives satisfied these two criteria in the minimized docking poses generated by our standard protocol. Ligand conformational artifacts were also shown to contribute to the occurrence of false positives in a number of cases. Application of this knowledge in the form of docking constraints and post‐processing filters provided consistent improvements in virtual screening performance on all systems. The false‐positive rates were significantly reduced and the enrichment factors increased by an average of twofold. On the basis of these results, a generalized two‐step protocol for virtual screening on kinase targets is suggested. Proteins 2006.