Mixed-State Entanglement and Distillation: Is there a “Bound” Entanglement in Nature?
- 15 June 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review Letters
- Vol. 80 (24), 5239-5242
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.80.5239
Abstract
It is shown that if a mixed state can be distilled to the singlet form it must violate partial transposition criterion [A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1413 (1996)]. It implies that there are two qualitatively different types of entanglement: “free” entanglement which is distillable, and “bound” entanglement which cannot be brought to the singlet form useful for quantum communication purposes. A possible physical meaning of the result is discussed.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Experimental Realization of Teleporting an Unknown Pure Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen ChannelsPhysical Review Letters, 1998
- Experimental quantum teleportationNature, 1997
- Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correctionPhysical Review A, 1996
- Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy ChannelsPhysical Review Letters, 1996
- Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channelsPhysical Review Letters, 1993
- Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen statesPhysical Review Letters, 1992
- Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theoremPhysical Review Letters, 1991
- Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable modelPhysical Review A, 1989
- Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?Physical Review B, 1935
- Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated SystemsMathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 1935