Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research
Top Cited Papers
- 1 September 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Academic Medicine
- Vol. 89 (9), 1245-1251
- https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000000388
Abstract
Purpose Standards for reporting exist for many types of quantitative research, but currently none exist for the broad spectrum of qualitative research. The purpose of the present study was to formulate and define standards for reporting qualitative research while preserving the requisite flexibility to accommodate various paradigms, approaches, and methods. Method The authors identified guidelines, reporting standards, and critical appraisal criteria for qualitative research by searching PubMed, Web of Science, and Google through July 2013; reviewing the reference lists of retrieved sources; and contacting experts. Specifically, two authors reviewed a sample of sources to generate an initial set of items that were potentially important in reporting qualitative research. Through an iterative process of reviewing sources, modifying the set of items, and coding all sources for items, the authors prepared a near-final list of items and descriptions and sent this list to five external reviewers for feedback. The final items and descriptions included in the reporting standards reflect this feedback. Results The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) consists of 21 items. The authors define and explain key elements of each item and provide examples from recently published articles to illustrate ways in which the standards can be met. Conclusions The SRQR aims to improve the transparency of all aspects of qualitative research by providing clear standards for reporting qualitative research. These standards will assist authors during manuscript preparation, editors and reviewers in evaluating a manuscript for potential publication, and readers when critically appraising, applying, and synthesizing study findings.This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Qualitative synthesis and systematic review in health professions educationMedical Education, 2013
- Authentic early experience in Medical Education: a socio-cultural analysis identifying important variables in learning interactions within workplacesAdvances in Health Sciences Education, 2012
- “It Depends”Academic Medicine, 2012
- Living and dying with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: multi-perspective longitudinal qualitative studyBMJ, 2011
- Publication guidelines for quality improvement in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE projectQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2008
- Proposed Standards for Medical Education Submissions to the Journal of General Internal MedicineJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2008
- Critically appraising qualitative research for systematic reviews: defusing the methodological cluster bombsEvidence & Policy, 2006
- A Tool for ReviewersAcademic Medicine, 2001
- Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative researchBMJ, 2000