Abstract
For many years, the specific name,hyalinus, has been used to designate certainPerilampusadults reared from a variety of insects belonging to the orders Lepidoptera, Orthoptera, Hymenoptera, and Diptera. Normally, taxonomists hesitate to classify parasites from such a wide range of hosts under one specific name; but in this case their fears were allayed by the concept that mostPerilampusspecies were strictly hyperparasitic and hence probably preyed upon a narrower range of hosts than indicated by rearing records. The hyperparasitic nature ofPerilampus hyalinusSay was established in 1912 by Smith who recovered its immature stages from various primary parasites of the fall webworm,Hyphantria cuneaDrury. Smith gave an account of the behaviour of the first-instar planidial stage and came to the conclusion that the species could not develop as a primary parasite of the fall webwom. A hyperparasitic behaviour was demonstrated also forP. tristisMayr on various primary parasites of the European pine shoot moth,Rhyacionia buoliana(Schiff.) (Bergold and Ripper, 1937). Primary parasitism was shown forP. chrysopaspp. (Clancy, 1946), and forP. italicusF. on the tenthredinid,Athalia colibriChrist. (Martelli, 1932). Nevertheless, the concept of hyperparasitism became generally accepted for most of the genus and discouraged attempts to utilize members of this genus for purposes of biological control of injurious defoliating insects.