Memory Drum Theory
- 1 September 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Motor Behavior
- Vol. 14 (3), 228-246
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1982.10735276
Abstract
Two experiments investigated the memory drum theory’s prediction (Henry & Rogers, 1960) that simple reaction time (SRT) increased with the complexity of the response to be initiated. Experiment 1 (N = 9) matched the Experiment 1, Group 1, SRT condition described by Henry and Rogers. Results of Experiment 1 replicated those of Henry and Rogers and indicated that the memory drum theory’s prediction of increased SRT as a function of increased complexity of response was tenable. Experiment 2 (N = 11) tested the effects of anatomical unit, extent, and target size on SRT, premotor time, and motor time. The results supported the contention that alternative explanations for SRT were possible. With complexity constant, increases in anatomical unit lead to increases in SRT, but only in the motor time component which indicated electromechanical rather than neuromotor program delays. It is proposed that the increased motor time could be explained by peripheral events such as the duration maximum torque must be applied by the agonist muscle(s) to generate the angular acceleration required to initiate rapid movement. SRT, premotor time, and motor time increased when target size was reduced from 6.35 cm to .79 cm. The increased premotor time could be a function of the determining of new equilibrium points for the elbow joint during response initiation. No effects on SRT were observed for extent.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Processing visual feedback information for movement control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1981
- Relative contribution of movement time, amplitude, and velocity to response initiation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1980
- Use of Simple Reaction Time in Motor Programming StudiesJournal of Motor Behavior, 1980
- Brain Mechanisms of MovementScientific American, 1979
- The Latency of Aiming MovementsJournal of Motor Behavior, 1976
- Feedback versus motor programming in the control of aimed movements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1975
- The organisation of a simple voluntary movement as analysed from its kinematic propertiesBrain Research, 1974
- Latency and Response ComplexityJournal of Motor Behavior, 1972
- Discrete movements in the horizontal plane as a function of their length and direction.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1949
- An action potential study of neuromuscular relations.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1935