THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION SYMPTOM INDEX SCORE IN THE EVALUATION OF WOMEN WITH BLADDER OUTLET OBSTRUCTION
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 163 (1), 207-211
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)68007-x
Abstract
Conclusions: The AUA symptom index score may be useful as a bothersomeness index in women with bladder outlet obstruction. However, subjective symptoms associated with bladder outlet obstruction are nonspecific and a complete urodynamic evaluation is essential for making the diagnosis.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- DIAGNOSING BLADDER OUTLET OBSTRUCTION IN WOMENJournal of Urology, 1999
- The international prostate symptom score in both sexes: A urodynamics-based comparisonNeurourology and Urodynamics, 1999
- Proposed cutoff values to define bladder outlet obstruction in womenUrology, 1998
- Combinations of maximum urinary flow rate and American Urological Association symptom index that are more specific for identifying obstructive and non-obstructive prostatismNeurourology and Urodynamics, 1996
- Lack of correlation of the American urological association symptom 7 index with urodynamic bladder outlet obstructionNeurourology and Urodynamics, 1996
- Correlation of American Urological Association Symptom Index With Obstructive and Nonobstructive ProstatismJournal of Urology, 1995
- Similarity of the American Urological Association Symptom Index among men with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), urethral obstruction not due to BPH and detrusor hyperreflexia without outlet obstructionBritish Journal of Urology, 1994
- Specificity of the American Urological Association Voiding Symptom Index: Comparison of Unselected and Selected Samples of Both SexesJournal of Urology, 1993
- Comparison of aua symptom index in unselected males and females between fifty-five and seventy-nine years of ageUrology, 1993
- The American Urological Association Symptom Index for Benign Prostatic HyperplasiaJournal of Urology, 1992