Selective vs Routine Use of Intraoperative Cholangiography
- 1 September 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Surgery
- Vol. 124 (9), 1041-1042
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1989.01410090047010
Abstract
• We reviewed the course of 314 patients who underwent cholecystectomy at a University Hospital in 1985. Two hundred eighty-five patients underwent cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis. Preoperatively elevated liver function test results, history of jaundice or pancreatitis, or operative findings of palpable common bile duct stone or dilated extrahepatic ducts were criteria for indicated cholangiography. Of 142 patients who had cholangiography with negative results, only 31 were indicated by these criteria. In 93 patients not having cholangiography performed, the criteria were met in only 8 patients. Of 38 patients who underwent common bile duct exploration, only 29 had stones. As operative time, morbidity, and cost were demonstrably increased in patients undergoing cholangiography, a selective approach is advocated. The number of unnecessary common bile duct explorations might be cut by almost half, while the incidence of finding clinically unsuspected yet significant common bile duct stones is negligible. (Arch Surg. 1989;124:1041-1042)This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Utility of routine intraoperative cholangiogram during cholecystectomy in children: A nationwide analysis of outcomes and readmissionsJournal of Pediatric Surgery, 2020
- The case for selective cholangiographyThe American Journal of Surgery, 1988
- Is operative cholangiography always necessary?British Journal of Surgery, 1986
- The usefulness of stool screening for diagnosing cholelithiasis in acute pancreatitisDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1977
- Calculous biliary tract diseaseCurrent Problems in Surgery, 1975
- Pathologic Correlation of GallstonesA.M.A. Archives of Surgery, 1959