Single-agent DTIC versus combination chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma: a meta-analysis of 3273 patients from 20 randomized trials
- 1 February 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Melanoma Research
- Vol. 11 (1), 75-81
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00008390-200102000-00009
Abstract
It is currently unclear whether any combination therapy for the treatment of metastatic melanoma is superior to standard single-agent dacarbazine (DTIC) in terms of tumour response and overall survival. The available randomized clinical trial data were combined in a meta-analysis to address this question. Initially a thorough MEDLARS search was conducted covering the time period from January 1970 to January 1999. This literature search was supplemented by manual searches of study bibliographies (including review articles) and review of relevant textbooks. The meta-analysis was performed according to a prospective protocol using strict study eligibility criteria. Data derived from randomized controlled trials comparing single-agent DTIC with combination chemo/immunotherapy were combined using a fixed effects model. Data were stratified into three combination therapy groups: DTIC-containing regimens, non-DTIC-containing therapy, and chemotherapy plus immunotherapy. The primary outcome of interest was the proportion of patients demonstrating a complete or partial response to treatment. A total of 20 randomized trials comprising 3273 patients were initially combined in a meta-analysis. This yielded an odds ratio (OR) of 1.23 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02–1.48), demonstrating that combination drug therapies are associated with a 23% increase in response rate compared with single-agent DTIC. The combination of DTIC plus interferon-α produced a tumour response rate 53% greater (95% CI 1.10–2.13) than that seen with DTIC alone. This increase was greater than that seen with DTIC-containing multi-drug regimens, which had an OR of 1.33 (95% CI 0.99–1.78). No difference in overall survival was demonstrated. Non-DTIC-containing treatment programmes showed no advantage over DTIC in terms of tumour response rate (OR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.45–1.32). The combination of DTIC and interferon-α appears more active than standard single-agent DTIC in metastatic melanoma. Further randomized clinical trials employing a DTIC plus interferon arm are necessary to confirm these results.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phase III trial of dacarbazine versus dacarbazine with interferon alpha-2b versus dacarbazine with tamoxifen versus dacarbazine with interferon alpha-2b and tamoxifen in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1998
- Experience with interferon alpha 2b combined with dacarbazine in the treatment of metastatic malignant melanomaMedical Oncology, 1995
- Multicenter randomized trial of dacarbazine alone or in combination with two different doses and schedules of interferon alfa-2a in the treatment of advanced melanoma.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1994
- Treatment of Metastatic Malignant Melanoma with Dacarbazine plus TamoxifenNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Dacarbazine versus dacarbazine-vindesine in disseminated malignant melanoma: A randomized phase II studyMedical Oncology and Tumor Pharmacotherapy, 1989
- The rate of malignant melanoma in the United States: Are we making an impact?Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1987
- Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: An overview of the randomized trialsProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1985
- Controlled study of DTIC versus DTIC plus epirubicin in metastatic malignant melanomaInvestigational New Drugs, 1984
- Randomized phase III trial of vinblastine, bleomycin, and cis-dichlorodiammine-platinum versus dacarbazine in malignant melanoma.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1984
- Therapy of malignant melanoma with an imidazole carboxamide and bis-chloroethyl nitrosoureaCancer, 1972