Detergents compared with each other and with antiseptics as skin ‘degerming’ agents
- 1 February 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Epidemiology and Infection
- Vol. 82 (1), 89-93
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s002217240002550x
Abstract
Three detergent preparations (bar soap, ‘Hibiscrub’ base and ‘LIC 76’), two antiseptic preparations (0·5% chlorhexidine in 95% ethyl alcohol and an alcohol jelly, ‘Alcogel’), and one antiseptic-detergent solution (4% chlorhexidine gluconate in a detergent base, ‘Hibiscrub’) were compared for their effectiveness, on a single use, in reducing the yield of bacteria from the hands of volunteers. The antiseptic and antiseptic-detergent preparations were more effective than the detergents, with a mean reduction in yield of skin bacteria of 96·0% after use of alcoholic chlorhexidine and of 81·2% after use of Hibiscrub. One of the detergents, LIC 76, appeared more effective than the others, causing a mean reduction in the yield of skin bacteria of 41·5%, compared with reductions of 4·6% by the Hibiscrub detergent base and an increase of 3·2% with bar soap; unlike the other detergents, LIC 76 was found to have appreciable bacteristatic and bactericidal properties.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transient skin flora: their removal by cleansing or disinfection in relation to their mode of deposition.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1978
- Preoperative Disinfection of Surgeons' Hands: Use of Alcoholic Solutions and Effects of Gloves on Skin FloraBMJ, 1974
- Use of 4% Chlorhexidine Detergent Solution (Hibiscrub) and Other Methods of Skin DisinfectionBMJ, 1973
- Disinfection of the Skin of Operation SitesBMJ, 1960
- Disinfection of the Hands of Surgeons and NursesBMJ, 1960