Abstract
The reflectance ratio of the middle-infrared band (MIR, 1.55-1.75 μm) to the near-infrared band (NIR, 0.76-0.90 mm) is linearly related to the log10 equivalent water thickness (EWT) for single leaves of different morphologies, whereas the MIR/NIR radiance ratio is correlated with the leaf area index (LAI). The hypothesis that the MIR/NIR ratio measures canopy EWT was tested by reanalysing airborne Thematic Mapper Simulator and field data obtained across a large gradient of LAI in western Oregon, U.S.A. The measured airborne MIR/NIR reflectance ratios for canopies were not significantly different from the predicted ratios using leaf data for canopy EWT, except for two desert woodland sites. The interpretation of the MIR/NIR ratio is scale-dependent, because leaf EWT is determined by physiology, whereas canopy EWT is determined primarily by variations in LAI.