Valuing the Environment Through Contingent Valuation
- 1 November 1994
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in Journal of Economic Perspectives
- Vol. 8 (4), 19-43
- https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.4.19
Abstract
Contingent valuation is now used around the world to value many types of public goods, including transportation, sanitation, health, and education, as well as the environment. The author describes how researchers go about making such surveys reliable, mentioning recent innovations in sampling, questionnaire design, and data analysis, including formulating the valuation as a closed-ended question about voting in a referendum to raise taxes for a particular purpose. He addresses various objections that contingent valuation results are incompatible with economic theory. Even without a market, there still exists a latent demand curve for nonmarket goods; contingent valuation represents a way to tease this out.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Value of clean water: The public's willingness to pay for boatable, fishable, and swimmable quality waterWater Resources Research, 1993
- Reasons for Framing EffectsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1993
- "Ask a Silly Question...": Contingent Valuation of Natural Resource DamagesHarvard Law Review, 1992
- Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveysApplied Cognitive Psychology, 1991
- EMPIRICAL TESTS OF HYPOTHETICAL BIAS IN CONSUMERS' SURPLUS SURVEYSAustralian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1988
- Market Transactions and Hypothetical Demand Data: A Comparative StudyJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1987
- Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesScience, 1974
- Congestion, quality deterioration, and optimal use: Wilderness recreation in the Spanish peaks primitive areaSocial Science Research, 1973
- Subjective Probabilities and Buying IntentionsThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1965
- The Focused InterviewAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1946