Randomized Prospective Study of Humeral Shaft Fracture Fixation: Intramedullary Nails Versus Plates
- 1 March 2000
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
- Vol. 14 (3), 162-166
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200003000-00002
Abstract
To compare the clinical and radiographic results for locked intramedullary (IM) nails and plates used in the treatment of humeral diaphyseal fractures. Prospective randomization by sealed-envelope technique of eighty-four patients into two study groups: those treated by intramedullary nailing (IMN group; n = 38) and those treated by compression plating (PLT group; n = 46). Patients admitted consecutively to a university-affiliated Level I trauma center. All skeletally mature patients admitted to Harborview Medical Center with acute humeral shaft fractures requiring surgical stabilization. Fractures of the diaphysis were defined as being at least three centimeters distal to the surgical neck and at least five centimeters proximal to the olecranon fossa. Treatment with locking antegrade intramedullary humeral nails (Russell-Taylor design [Smith and Nephew Richards]) or with 4.5-millimeter dynamic compression and limited contact dynamic compression plates (AO design [Synthes]). Clinical outcome measurements included fracture healing, radial nerve recovery, infection, and elbow and shoulder discomfort. Radiographic measurements included fracture alignment, time to healing, delayed union, and nonunion. Follow-up averaged thirteen months. Forty-two fractures (93 percent) in the PLT group were healed by sixteen weeks versus thirty-three fractures (87 percent) in the IMN group (p = 0.70). Shoulder pain and a decrement in shoulder range of motion (ROM) were significant associations with IMN (p = 0.007 for both variables) but not with PLT. A decrement in elbow ROM was significantly associated with PLT (p = 0.03), especially for fractures of the distal third of the diaphysis, whereas elbow pain was not (p = 0.123). The sum of other complications demonstrated nearly equal prevalence for both treatment groups. For patients requiring surgical treatment of a humeral shaft fracture, intramedullary nailing and compression plating both provide predictable methods for achieving fracture stabilization and ultimate healing.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Antegrade Interlocking Nailing of Acute Humeral Shaft FracturesClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1998
- Treatment of Humeral Shaft Fractures with Humeral Locked Nail and Comparison with Plate FixationPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1998
- Functional Treatment of Humeral Shaft Fractures: Indications and ResultsJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 1997
- Posterior Approaches to the Humerus: When Should You Worry About the Radial Nerve?Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 1996
- Lateral Approach to the Humeral Shaft: An Alternative Approach for Fracture TreatmentJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 1996
- Fracture Brace for the Treatment of Humerus Shaft Fractures Caused By Gunshot WoundsOrthopedic Clinics of North America, 1995
- Surgical Treatment of the Radial Nerve Lesions Associated with Fractures of the HumerusJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 1993
- Radial nerve palsy caused by open humeral shaft fracturesThe Journal of Hand Surgery, 1993
- Nonunion of the Humeral ShaftPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1987
- Functional bracing of fractures of the shaft of the humerusJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1977