Artemether‐lumefantrine for uncomplicated malaria: a systematic review
Open Access
- 3 February 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Tropical Medicine & International Health
- Vol. 9 (2), 192-199
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01186.x
Abstract
Background The World Health Organization (WHO) is promoting artemether‐lumefantrine for treating uncomplicated malaria. The objective of this review is to summarize available evidence of its effects compared with other antimalarial regimens. Methods We sought randomized and quasi‐randomized studies comparing artemether‐lumefantrine with any other antimalarial drug regimen. Databases searched were MEDLINE (to February 2003), EMBASE (to February 2003), and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (issue 1, 2003). Conference proceedings and reference article lists were searched and malaria researchers and the drug manufacturer were contacted. Two reviewers independently applied inclusion criteria and extracted data. Results Six trials (1698 participants) studied the four‐dose regimen. Fever and parasite clearance tended to be shorter with artemether‐lumefantrine, but parasitological failure on day 28 was more common with artemether‐lumefantrine in comparison with mefloquine (one trial, n = 233), halofantrine (one trial, n = 86) and mefloquine‐artesunate (one trial, n = 537); but less common with chloroquine (two trials, n = 378). For the six‐dose regimen, two studies compared artemether‐lumefantrine with mefloquine‐artesunate, but there was insufficient data to demonstrate any meaningful comparative effects for day 28 parasitaemia, and no difference in parasite or fever clearance time was detected. There were 11 parasitological failures with artemether‐lumefantrine and none with mefloquine‐artesunate. Conclusion There is no evidence to demonstrate the four‐dose regimen of artemether‐lumefantrine results in a higher cure rate than other antimalarial regimens against which it has been tested, apart from chloroquine in areas with high chloroquine resistance. Artemether‐lumefantrine has potential advantages over non‐artemisinin regimens because of the faster clearance time and gametocyte clearance. There is insufficient evidence about the six‐dose regimen to know whether it is less or more effective than current antimalarial drug regimens.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- A clinical and pharmacokinetic trial of six doses of artemether-lumefantrine for multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Thailand.The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2001
- Artesunate Reduces but Does Not Prevent Posttreatment Transmission ofPlasmodium falciparumtoAnopheles gambiaeThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2001
- The challenge of chloroquine-resistant malaria in sub-Saharan AfricaHealth Policy and Planning, 2001
- Artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of multidrug-resistant falciparum malaria.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2000
- Cardiac effects of co-artemether (artemether/lumefantrine) and mefloquine given alone or in combination to healthy volunteersEuropean Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2000
- A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, comparative safety, and efficacy trial of oral co-artemether versus oral chloroquine in the treatment of acute uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in adults in India.The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2000
- Averting a malaria disasterThe Lancet, 1999
- Antimalarial drug resistance and combination chemotherapyPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1999
- Effects of artemisinin derivatives on malaria transmissibilityThe Lancet, 1996
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986