Medical sonography: Reproductive effects and risks

Abstract

While it is clear that the levels and types of medical sonography that have been used in the past have no measurable risks, it would be inaccurate to label the modality of ultrasound as totally safe regardless of exposure. Most agents have reproductive risks and even teratogenic risks if the exposure is raised sufficiently. Thus the prudent use of sonography means that clinicians and designers of equipment have to maintain exposures far below the risks that have been demonstrated in animal studies and from the knowledge obtained about the physical changes that can be produced in humans as the absorbed dose is elevated. The reproductive risks were evaluated using five criteria: 1) human epidemiology, 2) secular trend data, 3) animal experiments, 4) dose response relationships, and 5) biologic plausibility. The analysis reveals that the human epidemiology does not indicate that diagnostic ultrasound presents a measurable risk to the developing embryo or fetus. Animal studies also indicate that diagnostic levels of ultrasound are safe and do not elevate the fetal temperature into the region where deleterious embryonic and fetal effects will occur. Because higher exposures of ultrasound can elevate the temperature of the embryo, the use of diagnostic procedures and the design of sonographic equipment should take into consideration the hyperthermic potential of higher exposures of ultrasound and the hypothetical additional risk of performing sonography on pregnant patients who are febrile. It would appear that if the embryonic temperature never exceeds 39°C, then there is no measurable risk. We suggest that sonography (the field) and sonogram (the procedure) are the most appropriate and least anxiety provoking terms.