Genetic transformation of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) using cotyledonary node as explant and a promoterlessgus::nptII fusion gene based vector
- 1 June 2006
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Biosciences
- Vol. 31 (2), 235-246
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02703916
Abstract
We have generated putative promoter tagged transgenic lines inArachis hypogaea cv JL-24 using cotyledonary node (CN) as an explant and a promoterless gus::nptII bifunctional fusion gene mediated byAgrobacterium transformation. MS medium fortified with 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) at 4 mg/l in combination with 0.1 mg/l α-napthaleneacetic acid (NAA) was the most effective out of the various BAP and NAA combinations tested in multiple shoot bud formation. Parameters enhancing genetic transformation viz. seedling age,Agrobacterium genetic background and co-cultivation periods were studied by using the binary vector p35SGUSINT. Genetic transformation with CN explants from 6-day-old seedlings co-cultivated withAgrobacterium GV2260 strain for 3 days resulted in high kanamycin resistant shoot induction percentage (45%); approximately 31% transformation frequency was achieved with p35S GUSINT in Β-glucuronidase (GUS) assays. Among thein vivo GUS fusions studied with promoterless gus::nptII construct, GUS-positive sectors occupied 38% of the total transient GUS percentage. We have generated over 141 putative T0 plants by using the promoterless construct and transferred them to the field. Among these, 82 plants survived well in the green house and 5 plants corresponding to 3.54% showed stable integration of the fusion gene as evidenced by GUS, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Southern blot analyses. Twenty-four plants were positive for GUS showing either tissue-specific expression or blue spots in at least one plant part. The progeny of 15 T0 plants indicated Mendelian inheritance pattern of segregation for single-copy integration. The tissue-specific GUS expression patterns were more or less similar in both T0 and corresponding T1 progeny plants. We present the differential patterns of GUS expression identified in the putative promoter-tagged transgenic lines in the present communication.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recent Advances in Legume TransformationPlant Physiology, 2003
- T-DNA Tagging in a Genomics EraCritical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 2002
- Mesorhizobium loti Increases Root-Specific Expression of a Calcium-Binding Protein Homologue Identified by Promoter Tagging in Lotus japonicusMolecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®, 2000
- A simple system for pea transformationPlant Cell Reports, 1997
- T‐DNA tagging of a seed coat‐specific cryptic promoter in tobaccoThe Plant Journal, 1994
- Identification of molecular markers of embryogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana by promoter trappingThe Plant Journal, 1994
- Tagging genomic sequences that direct transgene expression by activation of a promoter trap in plantsTransgenic Research, 1993
- Improved high-level constitutive foreign gene expression in plants using an AMV RNA4 untranslated leader sequencePlant Science, 1993
- A bifunctional fusion between β-glucuronidase and neomycin phosphotransferase: a broad-spectrum marker enzyme for plantsGene, 1991
- A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bio Assays with Tobacco Tissue CulturesPhysiologia Plantarum, 1962