Effect of Various Diuretic Treatments on Rosiglitazone-Induced Fluid Retention
Open Access
- 1 December 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Vol. 17 (12), 3482-3490
- https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2006060606
Abstract
The efficacy of diuretics in the management of rosiglitazone (RSG)-induced fluid retention was evaluated in a multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, proof-of-concept study. Of 381 patients who had type 2 diabetes and were on treatment with sulfonylurea or sulfonylurea plus metformin, 260 (63% male, 37% female) showed evidence of volume expansion as defined by an absolute reduction in hematocrit (Hct) of ≥0.5% after 12 wk of rosiglitazone 4 mg twice daily. They were randomly assigned to five treatments for 7 d: (1) Continuation of RSG (RSG-C), (2) RSG + furosemide (RSG+FRUS), (3) RSG + hydrochlorothiazide (RSG+HCTZ), (4) RSG + spironolactone (RSG+SPIRO), and (5) discontinuation of RSG. The primary end point was change in Hct at day 7 of diuretic treatment phase, powered to compare each diuretic group and the RSG discontinuation with the control group of RSG-C, with adjustments for multiple testing. After 12 wk on RSG, Hct fell by mean of 2.92% (95% confidence interval [CI] −3.10 to −2.63%; P < 0.001) and extracellular fluid volume increased by 0.62 L/1.73 m2 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.90 L/1.73 m2; P < 0.001). After treatment, the RSG+SPIRO group only showed a mean increase in Hct of 0.24%. The estimated mean difference in Hct reduction was significant: 1.14% (95% CI 0.29 to 1.98%) for RSG+SPIRO (P = 0.004) and 0.87% (95% CI 0.03 to 1.71%) for RSG+HCTZ (P = 0.041) only. In additional analyses of between-diuretic treatment effects SPIRO induced a greater Hct rescue at 0.88% (95% CI −0.12 to 1.87%; P = 0.095) and extracellular fluid volume reduction of −0.75 L/1.73 m2 (95% CI −1.52 to 0.03 L/1.73 m2; P = 0.06) compared with FRUS, suggesting superiority in the management of RSG-associated fluid retention. There were no significant differences between SPIRO and HCTZ. These findings are consistent with peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor-γ agonist activation of the epithelial sodium channel in the distal collecting duct, a site of action of SPIRO and a potential target for thiazide diuretics.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events): a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2005
- GI262570, a Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ Agonist, Changes Electrolytes and Water Reabsorption from the Distal Nephron in RatsJournal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 2004
- PPARγ activation enhances cell surface ENaCα via up‐regulation of SGK1 in human collecting duct cellsThe FASEB Journal, 2003
- Peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptors (PPARS): regulators of gene expression in heart and skeletal muscleActa Physiologica Scandinavica, 2003
- Effectiveness of Spironolactone Added to an Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor and a Loop Diuretic for Severe Chronic Congestive Heart Failure (The Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study [RALES])**See Appendix for full list of RALES investigators.The American Journal of Cardiology, 1996
- The electroneutral Na+-(K+)-Cl− cotransport familyKidney International, 1996
- A new method for monitoring body fluid variation by bioimpedance analysis: The RXc graphKidney International, 1994
- Cardiomyopathy of OverloadNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Thiazide diuretic effect on medullary collecting duct function in the ratKidney International, 1983