Meta-style and expert review
- 1 November 1999
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in The Lancet
- Vol. 354 (9193), 1834-1835
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(99)00355-4
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysisJAMA, 1999
- The role of meta-analysis in the regulatory process for foods, drugs, and devices.JAMA, 1999
- Meta-analysis and Epidemiologic Studies in Drug Development and Postmarketing SurveillanceJAMA, 1999
- Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?The Lancet, 1998
- CONSORT: An Evolving Tool to Help Improve the Quality of Reports of Randomized Controlled TrialsJAMA, 1998
- Beyond CONSORT: Need for Improved Reporting Standards for Clinical TrialsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1998
- Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled TrialsJAMA, 1996
- Japanese and American reports of randomized trials: differences in the reporting of adverse effectsControlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Problems induced by meta‐analysesStatistics in Medicine, 1991