Conditioning, Expectancy, and the Placebo Effect: Comment on Stewart-Williams and Podd (2004).
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Psychological Bulletin
- Vol. 130 (2), 341-343
- https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.341
Abstract
Classical conditioning is included as a component in the response expectancy model of placebo responding. Though introspectable when attention is drawn to them, expectancies need not be in awareness while guiding behavior. Most placebo effects are linked to expectancies, and classical conditioning is one factor (but not the only factor) by which these expectancies can be produced and altered. Conditioned placebo effects without expectancies exist but are relatively rare in humans. The adaptive advantage of cognition is increased response flexibility. For it to convey that benefit, however, it must be capable of overriding the influence of simpler automatic processes. Thus, the higher up the phylogenetic scale, the smaller the role of nonconscious conditioning processes and the larger the role of cognition.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Placebo Effect: Dissolving the Expectancy Versus Conditioning Debate.Psychological Bulletin, 2004
- Inducing placebo respiratory depressant responses in humans via opioid receptorsEuropean Journal of Neuroscience, 1999
- Automaticity in clinical psychology.American Psychologist, 1999
- The specific effects of prior opioid exposure on placebo analgesia and placebo respiratory depressionPain, 1998
- Classical conditioning and the placebo effectPain, 1997
- Pavlovian conditioning: It's not what you think it is.American Psychologist, 1988
- Attention to ActionPublished by Springer Nature ,1986
- Response expectancy as a determinant of experience and behavior.American Psychologist, 1985
- The placebo effect and the cognitive-behavioral revolutionCognitive Therapy and Research, 1978