Density conversion factor determined using a cone-beam computed tomography unit NewTom QR-DVT 9000
- 1 November 2006
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Dento maxillo facial radiology
- Vol. 35 (6), 407-409
- https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/55276404
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine a conversion coefficient for Hounsfield Units (HU) to material density (g cm−3) obtained from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom QR-DVT 9000) data. Methods: Six cylindrical models of materials with different densities were made and scanned using the NewTom QR-DVT 9000 Volume Scanner. The raw data were converted into DICOM format and analysed using Merge eFilm and AMIRA to determine the HU of different areas of the models. Results: There was no significant difference (P=0.846) between the HU given by each piece of software. A linear regression was performed using the density, ρ (g cm−3), as the dependent variable in terms of the HU (H). The regression equation obtained was ρ=0.002H−0.381 with an R2 value of 0.986. The standard error of the estimation is 27.104 HU in the case of the Hounsfield Units and 0.064 g cm−3 in the case of density. Conclusion: CBCT provides an effective option for determination of material density expressed as Hounsfield Units.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phantom studies for possible dose reduction in CT head proceduresRadiation Protection Dosimetry, 2005
- Bone classification: clinical‐histomorphometric comparisonClinical Oral Implants Research, 1999
- Hypothetical mortality risk associated with spiral computed tomography of the maxilla and mandibleEuropean Journal of Oral Sciences, 1996
- Bone density and quality measurement using ultrasoundCurrent Opinion in Rheumatology, 1996
- Absorbed doses from computed tomography for dental implant surgery: comparison with conventional tomography.Dento maxillo facial radiology, 1993
- Absorbed doses and energy imparted from tomography for dental implant installation. Spiral tomography using the Scanora technique compared with hypocycloidal tomography.Dento maxillo facial radiology, 1992
- Site classification for the osseointegrated implantThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1989
- Canine retraction with J hook headgearAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1980
- The effects of orthopedic forces on the craniofacial complex utilizing cervical and headgear appliancesAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1976
- Three-dimensional large displacement analysis of orthodontic appliancesJournal of Biomechanics, 1976