Skin Antisepsis Kits Containing Alcohol and Chlorhexidine Gluconate or Tincture of Iodine are Associated With Low Rates of Blood Culture Contamination
- 1 July 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
- Vol. 23 (7), 397-401
- https://doi.org/10.1086/502073
Abstract
Objective: : Skin preparation is an important factor in reducing the rate of blood culture contamination. We assessed blood culture contamination rates associated with the use of skin antisepsis kits containing either 2% alcoholic chlorhexidine gluconate or 2% alcoholic tincture of iodine.Design: : Prospective, blinded clinical trial.Setting: : Tertiary-care teaching hospital.Patients: : Adult patients in medical wards, the medical intensive care unit, and the cardiac intensive care unit who needed paired, percutaneous blood cultures.Interventions: : House officers, medical students, and healthcare technicians drew the blood for cultures. We prepared sacks containing all of the necessary supplies, including two different types of antiseptic kits. In each sack, one kit contained 2% chlorhexidine in 70% isopropyl alcohol and the other contained 2% tincture of iodine in ethyl alcohol and 70% isopropyl alcohol. Each patient received chlorhexidine at one site and tincture of iodine at the other.Results: : Four (0.9%) of 430 blood culture sets from 215 patients were contaminated. The contamination rate when using alcohol and chlorhexidine (1 of 215, 0.5%) did not differ significantly from the contamination rate when using tincture of iodine (3 of 215,1.4%;P= .62, McNemar test). There was an 87% probability that the two interventions differed by less than 2% in their rate of contamination.Conclusions: : Both of these antiseptic kits were highly effective for skin preparation prior to drawing blood for cultures. The use of these kits may have contributed to the low contamination rate observed in this study.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Financial and Clinical Impact of False‐Positive Blood Culture ResultsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2001
- Skin antisepsis: past, present, and futureJournal of Vascular Access Devices, 2001
- Chlorhexidine Compared with Povidone-Iodine as Skin Preparation before Blood CultureAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1999
- A randomized trial of povidone-iodine compared with iodine tincture for venipuncture site disinfection: effects on rates of blood culture contaminationAmerican Journal Of Medicine, 1999
- The Clinical Significance of Positive Blood Cultures in the 1990s: A Prospective Comprehensive Evaluation of the Microbiology, Epidemiology, and Outcome of Bacteremia and Fungemia in AdultsClinical Infectious Diseases, 1997
- Current Blood Culture Methods and Systems: Clinical Concepts, Technology, and Interpretation of ResultsClinical Infectious Diseases, 1996
- The Effect of Skin Disinfection Materials on Reducing Blood Culture ContaminationAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1993
- Effect of lodophor vs Iodine Tincture Skin Preparation on Blood Culture Contamination RateJAMA, 1993
- Prospective randomised trial of povidone-iodine, alcohol, and chlorhexidine for prevention of infection associated with central venous and arterial cathetersThe Lancet, 1991
- Lack of effect of changing needles on contamination of blood culturesThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 1990