Sensitivity of Annual Evaporation to Soil and Root Properties in Two Models of Contrasting Complexity
Open Access
- 1 December 2003
- journal article
- Published by American Meteorological Society in Journal of Hydrometeorology
- Vol. 4 (6), 1276-1290
- https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2003)004<1276:soaets>2.0.co;2
Abstract
Simulations of soil water and evapotranspiration with physically based models at broad scales vary in both complexity of processes modeled and in parameterization of soil and root properties. Sensitivity of annual evaporation Eann to some of these processes and parameters was tested with both a model allowing multiple soil layers (BROOK90) and a single-layered water balance model (WBM). For nine widely scattered locations in North America Eann was controlled primarily by climate and cover type, but within a location–type combination, Eann was controlled primarily by the available water capacity Wac, which is the product of available water fraction and effective root depth. The definition of the upper limit of available water is important; it is precisely defined here as the water volume fraction at 30-cm depth after 48 h of drainage from an initially saturated, homogeneous profile with a fixed gravity potential gradient at 2-m depth. Specification of root depth was as important as specification o... Abstract Simulations of soil water and evapotranspiration with physically based models at broad scales vary in both complexity of processes modeled and in parameterization of soil and root properties. Sensitivity of annual evaporation Eann to some of these processes and parameters was tested with both a model allowing multiple soil layers (BROOK90) and a single-layered water balance model (WBM). For nine widely scattered locations in North America Eann was controlled primarily by climate and cover type, but within a location–type combination, Eann was controlled primarily by the available water capacity Wac, which is the product of available water fraction and effective root depth. The definition of the upper limit of available water is important; it is precisely defined here as the water volume fraction at 30-cm depth after 48 h of drainage from an initially saturated, homogeneous profile with a fixed gravity potential gradient at 2-m depth. Specification of root depth was as important as specification o...Keywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Climate change and global water resourcesGlobal Environmental Change, 1999
- Decoupling of surface and near‐surface soil water content: A remote sensing perspectiveWater Resources Research, 1997
- Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scaleOecologia, 1996
- Development of a world data set of soil water retention properties using pedotransfer rulesGeoderma, 1996
- Changing ideas in hydrology — The case of physically-based modelsJournal of Hydrology, 1989
- On the Variation of Infiltration Into a Homogeneous Soil Matrix Containing a Population of MacroporesWater Resources Research, 1986
- A Field Study of Plant Resistance to Water Flow in Alfalfa1Agronomy Journal, 1984
- Empirical equations for some soil hydraulic propertiesWater Resources Research, 1978
- A SIMPLE METHOD FOR DETERMINING UNSATURATED CONDUCTIVITY FROM MOISTURE RETENTION DATASoil Science, 1974
- Transport of Water in the Soil-Plant-Atmosphere SystemJournal of Applied Ecology, 1965