How biased are estimates of extinction probability in revisitation studies?
- 15 June 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Ecology
- Vol. 94 (5), 980-986
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01151.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- EVALUATION OF CLOSED CAPTURE–RECAPTURE METHODS TO ESTIMATE ABUNDANCE OF HAWAIIAN MONK SEALSEcological Applications, 2004
- ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY AND SPECIES DETECTION PROBABILITY PARAMETERS FOR TERRESTRIAL SALAMANDERSEcological Applications, 2004
- Temporal changes (1986–1999) in populations of primrose (Primula vulgaris Huds.) in an agricultural landscape and implications for conservationBiological Conservation, 2002
- An evaluation of the status of five threatened plant species in the PyreneesBiological Conservation, 2002
- DETERMINANTS OF PLANT EXTINCTION AND RARITY 145 YEARS AFTER EUROPEAN SETTLEMENT OF AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALANDEcology, 2000
- ESTIMATING SPECIES RICHNESS: THE IMPORTANCE OF HETEROGENEITY IN SPECIES DETECTABILITYEcology, 1998
- Local Extinctions of Plants in Remnants of Extensively Used Calcareous Grasslands 1950 -1985. Extinciones Locales de Plantas en Remanentes de Pastizales Calcareos de Uso extensivo entre 1950 y 1985Conservation Biology, 1997
- Plant Species Lost in an Isolated Conservation Area in Metropolitan Boston from 1894 to 1993Conservation Biology, 1996
- Robust Estimation of Population Size When Capture Probabilities Vary Among AnimalsEcology, 1979
- Estimation of the size of a closed population when capture probabilities vary among animalsBiometrika, 1978