Supporting ‘work‐related goals’ rather than ‘return to work’ after cancer? A systematic review and meta‐synthesis of 25 qualitative studies
- 10 August 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Psycho‐Oncology
- Vol. 22 (6), 1208-1219
- https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3148
Abstract
Background This study aimed to systematically review and synthesise qualitative studies of employment and cancer. Methods A rigorous systematic review and meta‐synthesis process was followed. A total of 13 233 papers were retrieved from eight databases; 69 were deemed relevant following title and abstract appraisal. Four further publications were identified via contact with key authors. Screening of full texts resulted in the retention of 25 publications from six countries, which were included in the synthesis. Results Studies consistently indicate that for people with cancer, ‘work’ forms a central basis for self‐identity and self‐esteem, provides financial security, forms and maintains social relationships, and represents an individual's abilities, talents and health. Work is therefore more than paid employment. Its importance to individuals rests on the relative value survivors place on these constituent functions. The desirability, importance and subsequent interpretation of individuals' experience of ‘return to work’ appears to be influenced by the ways in which cancer affects these functions or goals of ‘work’. Our synthesis draws these complex elements into a heuristic model to help illustrate and communicate these inter‐relationships. Conclusion The concept of ‘return to work’ may be overly simplistic, and as a result, misleading. The proposed benefits previously ascribed to ‘return to work’ may only be achieved through consideration of the specific meaning and role of work to the individual. Interventions to address work‐related issues need to be person‐centred, acknowledging the work‐related outcomes that are important to the individual. A conceptual and operational shift towards supporting survivors to identify and achieve their ‘work‐related goals’ may be more appropriate. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Return-to-work interventions integrated into cancer care: a systematic reviewOccupational and Environmental Medicine, 2010
- Comparison of Focus Groups on Cancer and Employment Conducted Face to Face or by TelephoneQualitative Health Research, 2010
- Confronting chemobrain: an in-depth look at survivors’ reports of impact on work, social networks, and health care responseJournal of Cancer Survivorship, 2009
- Return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review of intervention studiesBMC Cancer, 2009
- “So, are you back to work yet?” Re-conceptualizing ‘work’ and ‘return to work’ in the context of primary bone cancerSocial Science & Medicine, 2008
- Changes in employment and household income during the 24 months following a cancer diagnosisSupportive Care in Cancer, 2008
- The meaning of work and working life after cancer: an interview studyPsycho‐Oncology, 2008
- Employment status and work-related difficulties in stomach cancer survivors compared with the general populationBritish Journal of Cancer, 2008
- Factors affecting cancer survivors' employment and work abilityActa Oncologica, 2007
- Survivorship and discourses of identityPsycho‐Oncology, 2002