Isotopic age determinations on granitic rocks from Tasmania
- 1 January 1965
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of the Geological Society of Australia
- Vol. 12 (2), 295-332
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00167616508728598
Abstract
Potassium‐argon and rubidium‐strontium isotopic age measurements show that emplacement of granitic rocks in Tasmania occurred during the Late Devonian and Early Carboniferous and in pre‐Devonian times, possibly in the Cambrian. In addition, a Precambrian granite, dated at about 750 m.y., has been recognized on the west coast of King Island. The granitic bodies of pre‐Devonian age include the Murchison River Granite, the Dove River Granite and its correlatives, and the adamellite on the southwest coast of Tasmania at Elliott Bay. These rocks were deformed during the Devonian Tabberabberan Orogeny with the result that leakage of radiogenic daughter products has occurred from minerals. Hence the indicated ages are younger than the true ages. Possibly these granitic rocks were emplaced during the Jukesian Movement of the Tyennan Orogeny, in the Late Cambrian, although a Precambrian age cannot be excluded for some of the bodies. As recognized by earlier workers the most important period of emplacement of granitic rocks in Tasmania was in the Middle Palaeozoic. The measured dates for this group of rocks range from 375 to 335 m.y., and indicate that intrusion occurred over an extended period from the Late Devonian to the Early or possibly Middle Carboniferous. There are distinct concentrations of measured ages at about 370 and 340 m.y. The granitic bodies of northeast Tasmania mainly yield the older age, whereas those of northwest Tasmania give the younger age. As the granites are post‐tectonic bodies the older age of about 375 m.y. provides a younger limit to the time of completion of the main folding in the Tabberabberan Orogeny, and this is consistent with the stratigraphic evidence. The evidence suggests that generation of granitic magma was initiated during the main folding associated with the Tabberabberan Orogeny, but that emplacement of the granites into the upper crust continued over a long period subsequently to the main folding phase. Alternatively, the younger granitic bodies, dated at about 340 m.y., may indicate that these rocks are related to the Early Carboniferous Kanimblan Orogeny recognized in Victoria and New South Wales; however, there is no field evidence to support such a proposition.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Petrology and Isotopic-Mineral Age Relations of a Contact Zone in the Front Range, ColoradoThe Journal of Geology, 1964
- Some Effects of Palaeozoic Folding on the Pre-Cambrian Rocks of the Frenchmans Cap Area, TasmaniaGeological Magazine, 1964
- The occurrence of eclogite on the Lyell Highway, TasmaniaMineralogical Magazine and Journal of the Mineralogical Society, 1963
- Fossil Forests of Ocú, PanamaScience, 1963
- Geologic Time ScaleScience, 1961
- GRAPHIC INTERPRETATION OF DISCORDANT AGE MEASUREMENTS ON METAMORPHIC ROCKSAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1961
- Age of Emplacement of GranitesNature, 1960
- Cauldron subsidences, granitic rocks, and crustal fracturing in S. E. AustraliaInternational Journal of Earth Sciences, 1959
- Geochronology by Radioactive DecayAnnual Review of Nuclear Science, 1958
- The Geology of Marysville, VictoriaGeological Magazine, 1932